Students in Library and Information Science (and recent grads and friends)
Network for students of Library and Information science. I know, I know, like we need *another* library network.
Started by blabla in School Stuff Oct 31.
Started by Karin Dalziel in Network announcements. Last reply by Biju.R Oct 7.
Started by Cassidy David in School Stuff Aug 15.
Started by Joe Fox in Everything Else! Mar 30.
Started by Rahul Pandey in Questions for LIS Students Mar 29.
Posted by nice girl on November 25, 2009 at 3:41am
Posted by Rose Tyler on November 12, 2009 at 10:54pm
Posted by Cindy Fallsen on November 11, 2009 at 9:06pm
Posted by Janet Wilkins on November 10, 2009 at 10:25pm
Posted by Lee W. on September 24, 2009 at 11:36pm
As many of you know I just returned from a trip to Europe. My first stop was in Bergen, Norway to meet some librarian friends and give a talk about open source at a conference. What I learned was that Bergen isn’t always freezing and that heavy coat I lugged around 2 airports was not necessary
What I learned is that the friends we make online can be so very awesome. We talk to these people daily and keep up with their lives via their blogs, twitter, facebook, email – whatever – and never really realize how very awesome they are. I also learned that the confidence I have when speaking in the US does not carry over to other countries – something I need to work on before the next international speaking engagement.
I then moved on to Venice, Italy followed by Rome, Italy where I met another librarian friend – another awesome friend who took time out of her day to take us around town and see the sights with us.
Now all of this is great, but most of you read this blog because you want to know about the new tools I learned about – and so – here we go.
While abroad I paid for everything out of my bank account but needed to keep track of what was spent so my mother and I could split the expenses when we returned home. To do this I used Xpenser.
For most of my trip I was without wifi access, but I did have my mobile phone. Xpenser allows me to send receipts and/or details about my expenses via various different media (phone, email, IM, SMS). It also has built in conversion tools – like currency conversion and mileage conversion. This means I was able to send an email to Xpenser with a subject like this ‘2 EUR rome metro to hotel” and it would convert that to $2.98 with a detail type that says “rome metro to hotel” and a note that includes the currency conversion
This tool is great for those who travel a lot for work and don’t want to keep all of their receipts (or frequently lose them). Simply use your phone to take a picture of the receipt and then email it to Xpenser and it will record the expense along with the image of the receipt. In addition to all I’ve said there are many more features I have yet to explore, but I wanted to share this tool with you all anyway so that you can all start using it to make your lives easier ![]()
I’m so excited. While I’ve been away on vacation, my two favorite photo sites have formed a partnership. Flickr & Snapfish now work well together. I used to have to upload my pics to both places when I wanted to create gifts or order prints – now I can just upload my pics to Flickr and then import them to Snapfish …
My gift creation this holiday season is going to be so much easier than in the past – thank you Flickr & Snapfish!!

Our baby!!
So my husband and I have a BIG project that we’ve been working on and we’ve finally decided to share it online…. we’re expecting! The baby is due in May 2010, a time which seems to be hurtling towards us at the speed of light.
It’s been a rough three months. I’ve been completely exhausted, which is why I’ve totally been falling behind in the work that I normally do in the evenings: email, blogging, writing, planning presentations, writing up documents for work, household chores, etc. However, I’m starting to get my energy back and I’ve regained a few more hours each day. I was also completely food averse for the first trimester. Nothing was appealing (much to my nutritionist’s dismay). However, I’ve turned a corner and now alternate between food aversion and being absolutely ravenous, so we’re moving in a good direction!
The baby apparently knew that John and I both keep an academic schedule, so it conveniently planned to arrive around spring exams, making maternity leave fit neatly over the summer months. I’ll be back at work in August. I won’t be leaving the professional conversations online and elsewhere, though I suspect I won’t be all that engaged while I’m away from the office learning about this new person in our lives and the role I’ll be planing. I’m starting to target my professional involvement a bit more and saying no to a lot more than I typically would. I figure as I get the hang of things, I can ramp back up as appropriate.
We’re super happy, excited, and a bit overwhelmed about this next step, but mostly excited. And I’m really excited to finally be able to share the news with you.
So the FAQs I’ve getting from folks In Real Life:
Twitter is beta testing a new re-tweet (RT) feature.

On first look, it’s pretty neat, but it’s missing an important feature – the ability to add your comments to the RT. This morning I saw a cute post by a library geek dad I know, it was a link to a T-shirt that I thought other geek dad’s might want to see – but the tweet said “I’m so getting this” so when I re-tweeted it looked like I (not a dad) wanted the shirt.

I’m also not seeing my RTs on the my Twitter homepage or in Adium – I only see them on my profile page on Twitter – which may be because the feature is still in beta – but at the same time, how do I really RT and share with my friends?? Hopefully this will all become more clear as I play some more.
In Vancouver, BC for ASIST 2009 Annual Meeting: Thriving on Diversity: Information Opportunities in a Pluralistic World.
Today is the 20th SIG-CR (Classification Research) Workshop: Bridging Worlds, Connecting People: Classification Transcending Boundaries.
1st session, which I’m in now, is titled: Crossing Cultural Boundaries: Indigenous Knowledge Organization. Moderator: Hope Olson. Papers are: Language, Text and Knowledge Organization: One Native American Story by Cheryl Metoyer; and, Martin Nataka’s “Indigenous Standpoint”: Toward a Theoretical Location for Indigenous Knowledge Organization by Ann Doyle. [These are not listed on the website. See link above for SIG-CR for titles of other papers below.]
2nd session will be Crossing Disciplinary Boundaries. Moderator: Barbara Kwasnik. Papers by Szostak & Gnoli, Ali Shiri, and Xiaoli Huang.
3rd session will be Crossing the Boundaries of Convention. Moderator: Corinne Jorgensen. Papers by Amelia Abreu, Kwan Yi, and Gabel and Smiraglia.
4th session will be Crossing System/Searcher Boundaries. Moderator: Dagobert Soergel. Papers by Marianne Lykke-Nielsen, Jens-Erik Mai, and Joseph Tennis.
Seems the paper by Timothy Patrick will not be presented.
There are also a handful of posters, including one by UIUC’s Ingbert FLoyd, Thomas Dousa and Michael Twidale.
Looking forward to seeing a bit of Vancouver and seeing colleagues again. I have already seen 3 of my 4 co-panelists from last year. In fact, they are here at SIG-CR.
When we head home we will be taking the train from Seattle over to Chicago, and then another to Champaign. I am really looking forward to that bit of the trip, too.
Academic reserves via ReservesDirect (as implemented at NCSU libraries)
-opensource
-functional requirements list: global, administrative, user, course, item, statistics
-contenders: Equella (not suited), Docutek e-res (no trail of versions over the semesters), Ares (good tools for the staff but not enough for faculty), ReservesDirect
-works through authentication (login); enrollment based for students (pull datafeed from registrar’s office); for profs, can only see own classes, not edit anyone else’s—can add their own documents and URLs; searchable, so faculty can see what is on reserve for other classes
-admin side: the’ve added ability to add a video; can see who has used a particular article over time; way to make links non-breakable as they move across platforms
-needing to educate faculty about metadata so the search function wrks better (or cean it up for them)
-good, useful canned stats with limiters for admin; faculty also get a report as to which items have been opened, how many times, and by how many students (but not which ones)
-pilot test summer 2008 w/ 4 faculty and 1 instructional designer; bug reports led to fixes (if had to do over, wouldn’t use faculty, just more instructional designers, since the one was the only peson who really gave useful feedback)
-full release fall 2008; lots of positive feedback from faculty
-migration: datamap, 17 gigs of data, broken links (all of them!), confused document icons, wayward data, safety net
-ran some instrution session for faculty, but they don’t take them—only the instructional design people. Made office calls in order to do one-on-one training. Also has a video tutorial.
-www.reservesdirect.org/wiki

How to be the Bad Guy Without Being Bad (now with LOLcats!)
-You have to have the right group of people with the right attitude in order to have everything work right; any other group of people makes for an entirely different group of people.
-She’s had 52% turnover in 3 yrs but now has the right mix of people.
-Poor performance eats at an organization, rendering it unproductive, slow-moving
-Basic responsibility: productive and well-disciplined individual (then they’re happy)
-3 types of issues: performance issues; attendance; beahviour/conduct
-punishment failures: uncertainty, inconsistency (favouritism), long-term disaster (looses power); breeds apathy
-performance improvement discussion: know your org’s process; serious and planned; specific goals; structured (one goal: have the person agree to change the behavior)
-prepping for discussion: identify the specific difference between the actual and desired performance (the person has to take responsibility, and that won’t happen without specifics—too easy for them to rationalize); anaylyze the impact of the problem (why to solve); identify consequences (“further disciplinaty action” isn’t enough—be specific); determine appropriate action plan
-actual vs. desired performance: type of problem (if there are multiple, limit to highest priority); be specific and limit to facts
-first conversation is about the behavior and opportunity to change; second is about failure to change (consequences)
-disciplinary: change in workflow, physical location, or whatever might be incentive
-5 questions: Did employee understand the policy that was violated? Did the employee know in advance that such behavior would be subject to disciplinary action? Was the rule violated reasonably related to the safe, efficient, and orderly operation of business? Is there substantial evidence that the employee actually did violate the rule? Is the action planned reasonable related to the seriousness of the offence, the employee’s record of service, and the action taken with other employees who have committed similar offenses?
-Conducting the discussion: Somewhere private; as soon as possible; give enough time for discussion (but don’t want it to be endless, either); Go straight to point—no sense dragging it out since they’re already freaking out or worried; let them talk about it from their POV and be an active listener; gain agreement; end on positive expectation of change (and follow up in writing)
-2 causes of performance probs: 1) lack of knowledge (training issue) and 2) lack of execution (clarify expectations)
-execution problems: clarify expectations; remove obstacles; provide feedbac; arrange appropriate consequences
-attendance problems: cause is irrelevant; only the effect counts. Individual responsibility—coming to work is a condition of employment, as is coming to work on time. Address as you would a performance issue: logical consequences; gain agreement; personal choice; further action.
-attitude probs: (other than psychotherapy, religious conversion, and brain surgery) Handle it same as others. Just don’t *tell* them they have a bad attitude! They’ve heard it before. Just get the expected behavior in writing.
-Discussion difficulties: “yeah but,” “I’ll try,” silence, irrelevancy. You’re going for a concrete answer. Keep the conversation on track.
-Dismissal (aka “No Fault Divorce”) Sometimes the best thing you can do is fire someone. It isn’t a judgement on them as a person—it just means that the fit is bad. Dismissal should not be a surprise to anyone involved. Lots of meetings, feedback, and written documentation. There is no other choice.
-Have a plan. Pre-meeting; meeting; post-meeting. Know org’s requirements.
-Run it by a jury first if you feel at all uncertain. Was employee aware? How do you know that they knew? Do you have documentation? Were they given time to improve? Was training provided?
-Write a script. Short and to point. Listen to response. Repeat as necessary. Anticipate questions and concerns.
-Avoid misdirected compassion. No one enjoys doing this. Don’t let that stop you from carrying out the process. Their actions have had an impact on your org. The time and effort is only worth it if the behaviour is fixed or they leave.
Q&A
-how do you deal w/ unions? Doesn’t have to do so now, but in past union was very supportive as long as there was cause.
-Before the divorce, do you consider moving them elsewhere within the org? Yes. Sometimes it works, but sometimes there are other issues. Act in good faith.

Usability Testing for websites and other applications
-focusing on tutorials and user guides
-started out as making sure web sites cohered to design standards, but has gradually morphed to include how users intact with the site—really have to think about how to include testing in implementation process
-ISO def’n: extent to which a product can be used by specified users…
-don’t forget the consent form! might have to talk w/ IRB, too
-Card sorting: use, perception, demand; have participants sort cards w/ headings, then have them come up w/ own headings, then interview (from soc and psych); can lead to navigation redesign; time consuming to test and analyze results (can take pictures of the cards post-sort to help)
-heuristic: best practice (Jakob Nielsen); need outside experts; evaluate for specific criteria (ie, match beween system and real world [library jargon]); fix now/soon/someday; hard to find experts (and $$); high learning curve; can be hard on the site designer due to negative focus
-Assessment testing: users complete tasks; objective or goal-oriented; review for duplication; arrange from easiest to hardest; best method for feedback on functionality and navigation; can be formal or informal; remember to debrief the participant
-choose right method: demographics of users, purpose of testing; need lots of user groups represented; use incentives to recruit (also, neutral location and timing) [do lib staff and librarians separately, since they use the site differently and staff might be more willing to be open w/out libs in the room—can be good to have outside moderators for some groups]
-testing 2.0 apps: Focus! assessment tests work best for this. specific audience; greater depth of test; user population may have no prior experience with the application, so have to account for that in the questions
-content testing: focus on info; tasks based on learning objectives; interfae independent
-software testing: focus on navigation; tasks based on finding info; interface dependent
-Be sure to be focusing on Content, not software (unless you’re doing OA, you can’t do anything about the software)
-pretest: use to refine questions; small sample user group; screen captures can really help; repeat until results are consistent; methods: interviews after, screen capture, filming
-designing test questions: be specific and task-oriented; pretest for validity and clarity; broad or narrow scope—keep to middle ground; longer is not better—don’t want to tire people out or have them get bored (on side of paper seems to be good; it looks do-able)
-samples:
-find book: Does the lib. own a copy of ____?
-access a db: Does the lib. have access to _________?
-find lib. hours: What time does the lib close on _____?
-find contact info: Where is liaison’s office?
-Use back button: How do you get to previous material?
-Nielsen says doing 5 should be plenty—diminishing returns after that. But they aren’t so sure.
-implications: highlights user interaction relative to design; focus on important content; indicates higher maintenance items; underscores tast complexity; potential redesign
-figured out that students were having different interactions w/ the info depending on the librarian who had created the libguide, so they’re going to write some standards for the guides based on their findings.
Q&A
-What type of 2.0? Tutorials and guides are the only ones they’ve done testing for.
-signifiant diff in user groups? Yes! Esp. btwn patrons and librarians, w/ libs not understanding what patrons want (user testing can debunk lib myths about what students want)
-institutional standards in the website redesign? yes. colors, header, and a few other things dictated by the school (Wartburg College) so they had to work around, but their head guy was ok with a little switcheroos
-how much time? card sorting: one afternoon (used magnetic board and handed out candy bars while at the ref desk); assessment takes much longer, esp. w/ pretesting, plus fact that application are often new to the user (and sometimes the lib!)

© 2009 Created by Karin Dalziel on Ning. Create a Ning Network!